

Let's consider, in more detail the relationship between airfoil geometry
and airfoil pressure distributions. The next few examples show some of the
effects of changes in camber, leading edge radius, trailing edge angle,
and local distortions in the airfoil surface.
A reflexed airfoil section has reduced camber over the aft section producing
less lift over this region. and therefore less nose-down pitching moment.
In this case the aft section is actually pushing downward and Cm at zero
lift is positive.

A natural laminar flow section has a thickness distribution that leads to
a favorable pressure gradient over a portion of the airfoil. In this case,
the rather sharp nose leads to favorable gradients over 50% of the section.

This is a symmetrical section at 4° angle of attack.
Note the pressure peak near the nose. A thicker section would have a less
prominent peak.

Here is a thicker section at 0°. Only one line is shown on the plot
because at zero lift, the upper and lower surface pressure coincide.

A conventional cambered section.

An aft-loaded section, the opposite of a reflexed airfoil carries more lift
over the aft part of the airfoil. Supercritical airfoil sections look a
bit like this.

The best way to develop a feel for the effect of the airfoil geometry on
pressures is to interactively modify the section and watch how the pressures
change. A Program for ANalysis and Design of Airfoils (PANDA) does just
this and is available from Desktop
Aeronautics. A very simple version of this program, is built into this
text and allows you to vary airfoil shape to see the effects on pressures.
(Go to Interactive Airfoil Analysis page by
clicking here.) The full version of PANDA permits arbitrary airfoil shapes,
permits finer adjustment to the shape, includes compressibility, and computes
boundary layer properties.